Why Law Firms Do Not Hire Freshers

-

The legal profession is generally known for it high standards, demanding workload and a huge responsibility for delivery of accurate results. Due to this reason, many law firms while recruitment prefer not to hire people fresh out of law school directly into important legal roles. This move may discourage new graduates but the main reason is rooted in practical, economic and quality-control considerations.

The environment of a law firm consists of accuracy, speed and correct judgment. Even a small mistake in drafting, research or compliance regarding any law can harm the firm's reputation. Fresh graduates even though they are academically qualified lack practical skills which is important while dealing with clients independently. Law school can only provide theoretical knowledge but it certainly does not prepare the students for basics about dealing with clients, presenting arguments before any court or negotiation styles. As a result, law firms prefer candidates who are experienced through internships or any prior employment because they require less supervision.

Training a fresher is expensive and takes a lot of time. Law firms are usually not that much invested in training a fresher and so they usually assign only one person to do the same. If the fresher is a fast learner then it is fine otherwise the person assigned to train him becomes frustrated and already overburdened with his own responsibilities. This also slows workflow and reduces billable hours which can otherwise be used in more productive work which in turn affects firm revenue. In a demanding and competitive market wherein clients demand efficiency, many firms are unwilling to allocate resources to training a fresher. Experienced candidates, on the other hand, can contribute faster and require limited oversight, making them a more financially viable option.

Clients pay high fees expecting their matters to be handled by professionals rather than freshers. If the firm assigns any legal matter to a fresher, it may lead to inefficiency and dissatisfaction. To maintain trust and ensure client satisfaction, firms assign legal matters to an experienced individuals who have an impeccable track record. Freshers who are still at a learning stage may not be able to meet client expectations.

Law firms work in high-pressure environment which include long hours, strong decision-making capabilities and patience. Many freshers take time to adapt in this type of demanding environment. These firms prefer candidates which have already proved themselves to handle pressure and have independent decision-making skills. 

Every year thousands of law graduates hope to enter the professional world but only a limited number of law firms positions are available. This excess supply allows firms to be selective in recruiting experienced candidates over freshers. Freshers are often encouraged to gain experience through internships or smaller firms before moving to competitive positions.

Lastly, while the unwillingness to hire freshers stems from practical realities such as training cost, risk management and client expectations, it does not mean freshers have no opportunities. With consistent upskilling, internships, and real-world exposure, freshers can bridge the gap and eventually become strong candidates for top law firms.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Crafting an Effective Legal Resume

-
A legal resume is not just a summary of qualifications but it also reflects a candidate's analytical ability and understanding of the legal profession. A legal resume has to be concise and tailored to a specific role irrespective of whether the job opportunity is in corporate, litigation or compliance. A strong legal resume includes presentation of educational qualifications i.e. law degree, university name, years of study and relevant academic distinctions. Including key subjects, research projects, or dissertations can be valuable, particularly for entry-level roles, as they demonstrate subject-matter familiarity and research depth. Professional experience should focus on specific work rather than description. Instead of listing only duties, the candidate should highlight the nature of work such as legal research, drafting contracts, conducting due diligence, contract lifecycle management, case management etc. Experience should be quantified to show impact and the language should...
Read more

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023

-
INTRODUCTION The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ("Bill") was introduced in Lok Sabha on August 11, 2023.   If enacted, this Bill will repeal the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.  The Code provides for the procedure for arrest, prosecution, and bail for offences under various Acts including the Indian Penal Code, 1860.  The Bill retains most of the provisions of the Code.   This Bill has introduced strict deadlines for processes of inquiry, investigation and trial, allowing police custody for more than 15 days, conducting trial if the accused has absconded, trial in electronic mode etc. The Bill wants to normalize electronic communication, electronic evidence and electronic forms in investigation, inquiry and trial. KEY CHANGES IN THE BILL The following are the key changes which are introduced in the Bill:- 1. Signatures and finger impression- The Code allows a Metropolitan/Judicial Magistrate to order any person to provide signatures or handwriti...
Read more

The Bharatiya Sakshya Bill, 2023

-
INTRODUCTION The Bhartiya Sakshya Bill, 2023 was introduced in Lok Sabha on August 11, 2023.  After being enforced, it will repeal the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The Act provides rules for the admissibility of evidence in legal proceedings. This Bill enhances the concept of electronic records admissible as evidence, and removes provisions related to telegraphic messages.  As per this Bill, the main aim is to consolidate and to provide for general rules and principles of evidence for a fair trial. The main reason for introducing this Bill is that the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 did not keep up with the social changes and advancements in technology in recent years. IMPORTANT CHANGES IN THE BILL The following are the key changes which are proposed in the Bill:- 1. There are two types of evidence known as documentary evidence and oral evidence. Documentary Evidence has included electronic records which have been printed or stored in a computer.  The Bill provides that electroni...
Read more