Why are Internships not provided with a Stipend

-

Internships have become an essential stepping stone for students especially in law. Yet, a common point for concern among interns is no stipend or a very low stipend. One of the main reasons is that companies view internships as learning-oriented rather than proper employment. Interns usually join law firms to gain exposure, understand professional workflows and build their core skills. Since the primary objective for internships is training rather than productivity, many law firms do not include interns as employees who can contribute in generating revenue. Due to this reason, they avoid giving stipend for internships.

Secondly, providing training to interns require a lot of time and resources from full time employees which no one wants to do. Supervising interns, offering guidance and reviewing their work for compliance is time taking and it slows down workflow rather accelerating it. Therefore, law firms feel that paying stipend for an intern who requires heavy supervision is not economically viable.

Thirdly, limitations in budget play an important role in small law firms, startups, NGOs etc. which may operate with constrained financial resources and prioritise salaries for permanent employees or business development. Offering unpaid internships is the only way to mentor newcomers without financial burden.

Another reason is oversupply of interns in fields like law wherein a large number of students seek practical exposure during their college years. When demand for internships exceeds availability, law firms cannot offer stipends and the students, motivated by the need to build their resumes accept these unpaid internships continuing the cycle.

Some law firms and companies view internships as a probationary period and so instead of giving a stipend, they provide training and later select the best performing interns for full time roles. In these cases, law firms and companies treat this unpaid phase as investment for evaluating long term potential.

Finally, lack of regulatory frameworks in many countries have allowed unpaid internships to continue without any barriers. No minimum stipend requirements are mandated so the firms have the option to choose how much stipend they can give to an intern.

In conclusion, internships often come without stipends due to economic constraints, training demands, talent oversupply, and weak regulatory requirements. While unpaid roles can still offer valuable learning, addressing this imbalance requires greater awareness, structured internship policies, and a shift toward treating interns as meaningful contributors to the professional ecosystem.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Crafting an Effective Legal Resume

-
A legal resume is not just a summary of qualifications but it also reflects a candidate's analytical ability and understanding of the legal profession. A legal resume has to be concise and tailored to a specific role irrespective of whether the job opportunity is in corporate, litigation or compliance. A strong legal resume includes presentation of educational qualifications i.e. law degree, university name, years of study and relevant academic distinctions. Including key subjects, research projects, or dissertations can be valuable, particularly for entry-level roles, as they demonstrate subject-matter familiarity and research depth. Professional experience should focus on specific work rather than description. Instead of listing only duties, the candidate should highlight the nature of work such as legal research, drafting contracts, conducting due diligence, contract lifecycle management, case management etc. Experience should be quantified to show impact and the language should...
Read more

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023

-
INTRODUCTION The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ("Bill") was introduced in Lok Sabha on August 11, 2023.   If enacted, this Bill will repeal the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.  The Code provides for the procedure for arrest, prosecution, and bail for offences under various Acts including the Indian Penal Code, 1860.  The Bill retains most of the provisions of the Code.   This Bill has introduced strict deadlines for processes of inquiry, investigation and trial, allowing police custody for more than 15 days, conducting trial if the accused has absconded, trial in electronic mode etc. The Bill wants to normalize electronic communication, electronic evidence and electronic forms in investigation, inquiry and trial. KEY CHANGES IN THE BILL The following are the key changes which are introduced in the Bill:- 1. Signatures and finger impression- The Code allows a Metropolitan/Judicial Magistrate to order any person to provide signatures or handwriti...
Read more

The Bharatiya Sakshya Bill, 2023

-
INTRODUCTION The Bhartiya Sakshya Bill, 2023 was introduced in Lok Sabha on August 11, 2023.  After being enforced, it will repeal the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The Act provides rules for the admissibility of evidence in legal proceedings. This Bill enhances the concept of electronic records admissible as evidence, and removes provisions related to telegraphic messages.  As per this Bill, the main aim is to consolidate and to provide for general rules and principles of evidence for a fair trial. The main reason for introducing this Bill is that the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 did not keep up with the social changes and advancements in technology in recent years. IMPORTANT CHANGES IN THE BILL The following are the key changes which are proposed in the Bill:- 1. There are two types of evidence known as documentary evidence and oral evidence. Documentary Evidence has included electronic records which have been printed or stored in a computer.  The Bill provides that electroni...
Read more